1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
2 years ago
7

Which are the New England colonies

History
1 answer:
Natalka [10]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.

You might be interested in
How did Hitler become chancellor in Germany?
r-ruslan [8.4K]
It would have to be C
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how the use of barbed wire was perceived negative by Texans.<br><br> Negative:
Burka [1]

Answer:

it causes injury’s

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
Describe the importance of the Buffalo to the plains Indians. Give me three facts please
Tju [1.3M]

The buffalo was important to the Indians because: Buffalo hide could be made into clothes, covers or tipis (or tepees). In this way the buffalo provided coverings to keep them warm and was also used to make their homes.

The buffalo is the very sources of life for the plains Indians. From the buffalo they got meat for food, skins for tipis, fur for robes, and anything else was for tools and things needed for everyday life. ... Bones, hooves, insides, horns, and hides. Even the buffalo's dung was used to make fuel.

The Sioux Indians used the entire buffalo following a kill. The buffalo hide was used for making tepees, clothes, moccasins, and robes. The hair was used to make rope and the horns were used as cups and dishes. Children fashioned sleds out of buffalo ribs, and buffalo fat was used as glue.

6 0
3 years ago
Which best explains charles I's actions after parliament refused him war funds
maxonik [38]
He dissolved Parliament.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, he faced a lot of criticism. What were the key ideas of The Prince, and how did these
    13·1 answer
  • In what way did the Antifederalists criticize the Constitution?
    6·2 answers
  • This map shows the greatest extent of
    7·2 answers
  • How did Japan not change under the Meiji Restoration?
    7·1 answer
  • What did the act of world war 1 accomplish?
    9·2 answers
  • What happened to many of the towns set up by the romans answer?
    6·1 answer
  • D Why was
    15·1 answer
  • All points along a parallel are the same distance from the equator.
    9·1 answer
  • World War I brought enormous changes to warfare and to the lives of millions of people. Complete
    13·1 answer
  • Because of the division of power in
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!