Alexander Hamilton was most likely: A. a federalist who supported ratification of the Constitution.
<h3>What is a Constitution?</h3>
A Constitution can be defined as a set of formally written laws and principles which typically determines the power and authority of a democratic government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights and freedom of her people (citizens).
Based on the historical records and information, during the debate over ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, two (2) opposing groups were formed and these were:
- Federalist party: supports ratification of the Constitution.
- Democratic-Republican party: does not support ratification of the Constitution.
In this context, we can infer and Logically deduce that Alexander Hamilton was most likely a federalist who supported ratification of the Constitution.
Read more on ratification of the Constitution here: brainly.com/question/16999770
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Read the following excerpt from Federalist #15 by Alexander Hamilton. Government implies the power of making laws. It is essential to the idea of a law, that it be attended with a sanction; or, in other words, a penalty or punishment for disobedience. If there be no penalty annexed to disobedience, the resolutions or commands which pretend to be laws will, in fact, amount to nothing more than advice or recommendation. Alexander Hamilton was most likely a Federalist who supported ratification of the Constitution. an Anti-Federalist who supported ratification of the Constitution. a Federalist who opposed ratification of the Constitution. an Anti-Federalist who opposed ratification of the Constitution.
Suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing (option B) - Both firms will advertise)
<h3>What is an advert?</h3>
An advert is a mass or public media message with is designed to convince people to but into a product, service or an idea.
Hence, it is correct to state rival firms will end up advertising.
Learn more about advertising at:
brainly.com/question/14227079
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing?
A) fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise.
B) Both firms will advertise
C) Both firms will choose NOT to advertise
D) Fizzo will chose to advertise and Pop will choosenot to advertise.
Hola yo solo habla español pero el es (5,9)
If a perfectly competitive business firm is a price taker, then: A. pressure from competing firms will force acceptance of the prevailing market price.
<h3>What is a perfectly competitive market?</h3>
A perfectly competitive market can be defined as a type of market that is typically characterized by many buyers and sellers of homogeneous products, and there is free entry and exit in the market.
<h3>What is a
price taker?</h3>
A price taker can be defined as a business firm that is operating in a perfectly competitive market and is generally required to take the prevailing market price for its homogeneous product.
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that pressure from other competing business firms would force acceptance of the prevailing market price when a perfectly competitive business firm is a price taker.
Read more on price here: brainly.com/question/11898489
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
If a perfectly competitive firm is a price taker, then
A. pressure from competing firms will force acceptance of the prevailing market price.
B. it must be a relatively small player compared to its competitors in the overall market.
C. it can increase or decrease its output without affecting overall quantity supplied in the market.
D. quality differences will be very perceptible and will play a major role in purchasers' decisions.
Answer:
my mother is a caring, loving, and supportive woman who takes time out of her day to help me with concerns or problems with my school work.
Explanation:
