1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
2 years ago
13

Positive effects of progressive era

History
1 answer:
Dominik [7]2 years ago
8 0
The positive effects of the Progressive Era could include:

1) The advance in women's suffrage
2) Education laws 
3) Working condition laws
4) Unions for workers 
5) Industrialization
6) Child labor laws
You might be interested in
Which answer best describes one effect of free enterprise on the United States
Sedbober [7]

It brought conflict between labor and management.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A key principle of the economic theory of communism is
yawa3891 [41]
Communism is not about a redistribution of wealth. Communism argues that wealth is unequally distributed in the first place because capitalism is inherently unfair, and that redistributing wealth (by taking from rich people and giving to poor people) would never solve the problem in the long term. Communism therefore seeks to eliminate capitalism altogether by eliminating markets, by giving the government control of the means of production (like factories and farms), and by distributing goods (like food and gasoline) to people according to need. The goal is to eliminate economic classes by eliminating need, so that there's no need to redistribute wealth, since everyone would be in an equal condition of prosperity. In practice, however, this has never really worked out.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Briefly explain the Bosnian Crisis. Austria-Hungary took over part of a Turkish province in Bosnia. This outraged Serbians who f
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

Bosnian crisis of 1908, state of severe international tension caused by the annexation by Austria-Hungary of the Balkan provinces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Congress of Berlin (1878) had given Austria-Hungary the right to occupy and administer Bosnia and Herzegovina temporarily, but the provinces officially remained possessions of the Ottoman Empire. Still, the Austrian administration tried mightily and at great expense to improve the strategically valuable region economically and to link it closely with Austria-Hungary. When in July 1908 the Young Turks staged a revolution in Constantinople (now Istanbul), established a constitutional government, and inaugurated a reform program, the Austrian foreign minister Graf (count) Lexa von Aehrenthal resolved to annex Bosnia and Herzegovina before the new Turkish regime could regain control over them.

To that end Aehrenthal met the Russian foreign minister, Aleksandr P. Izvolsky, at Buchlau, in Moravia; and, on Sept. 16, 1908, Izvolsky agreed that Russia would not object to the annexation. Aehrenthal pledged that in return Austria would not object to opening the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits to Russian warships, an advantage that had been denied to Russia since 1841. By a rescript of Oct. 7, 1908, Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Izvolsky, unprepared for such immediate action, could not control the strong popular opposition to the annexation that developed in Russia. Furthermore, Serbia, which was closely related to Bosnia and Herzegovina geographically and ethnically, was outraged by the annexation. It demanded that Austria cede a portion of Bosnia and Herzegovina to Serbia, and Izvolsky, pressed by anti-Austrian opinion in Russia, was forced to support the Serbian claims. Austria, however, firmly supported by its ally Germany, threatened to invade Serbia if that country persisted in its demands. Russia, having failed to secure equally strong support from its ally France, could not risk a war against both Austria-Hungary and Germany for Serbia’s sake, and in March 1909 Izvolsky notified Germany that Russia accepted Austria’s annexation. Although the crisis was resolved without immediate warfare, the resulting embittered relations between Serbia and Austria-Hungary and Russia’s resentment at having been deceived and humiliated contributed to the outbreak of World War I.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Who should govern? Explain the ideas behind representative democrac
Nimfa-mama [501]

Michelle Obama, but not her lunch progam

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kansas become known as “Bleeding Kansas”?<br> (help me please)
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:This period of guerrilla warfare is referred to as Bleeding Kansas because of the blood shed by pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups, lasting until the violence died down in roughly 1859. Most of the violence was relatively unorganized, small scale violence, yet it led to mass feelings of terror within the territory.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the first postulate of special relativity imply the second?
    13·1 answer
  • Property should be held in common is one of whose basic belief?
    9·1 answer
  • How did choreography impact people of the world view during the age of exploration
    14·1 answer
  • Darius I who was he?
    12·1 answer
  • Where was the demand greatest for salt that North African traders supplied? 1. in tropical and savanna Africa 2. in the Great Ri
    8·2 answers
  • 1. to see or understand the difference; to make a distinction
    6·1 answer
  • Which philosopher did not suggest the separation of powers in government?
    12·2 answers
  • Where did the homestead act openlnd to farming
    8·2 answers
  • Why did Southern states progress more slowly than Northern states? A. The North had more of a social and economic mix. B. All No
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP!!!! I'M DOING THE TEST NOW
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!