English and French Kingdoms had both similarities and differences, during the late 1600's.
Both had a monarchical system, with a king ruling the country.
However, France had been under the rule of Louis XIV for over 60 years by the end of the 17th century, thus, he had consolidated his power, and the crown's power above everything. He eliminated the remnants of feudalism still left across France and imposed a rule of absolute monarchy.
In contrast to the English kingdom, where the parliament was powerful enough to denounce King James II for abuse of power through the use of the Bill of Rights, and was a solid institution with the authority to depose the king if needed. The English kingdom had clear limits on the Crown's power and authority, and several tax and civil right laws could not be emitted without the Parliaments permission.
1898: The Birth of a Superpower. The 1898 Treaty of Paris ending the war gave Cuba its independence and also ceded important Spanish possessions to the United States—notably Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and the small island of Guam. The United States was suddenly a colonial power with overseas dependencies.
Answer:
They were afraid that Napoléon might change his mind and revoke the agreement. The Supreme Court's ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, that federal law is superior to state law, directly influenced which case? declaring laws unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Hope it helps! Correct me if I am wrong :>
Im sure about my answer :>
Can you please mark me as brainlest?
Explanation:
A reform movement is a type of social movement that aims to bring a social or political system closer to the community's ideal. A reform movement is distinguished from more radical social movements such as revolutionary movements which reject those old ideals, in that the ideas are often grounded in liberalism, although they may be rooted in socialist (specifically, social democratic) or religious concepts. Some rely on personal transformation; others rely on small collectives, such as Mahatma Gandhi's spinning wheel and the self-sustaining village economy, as a mode of social change. Reactionary movements, which can arise against any of these, attempt to put things back the way they were before any successes the new reform movement(s) enjoyed, or to prevent any such successes.
<span>The question is asking us "How can the lassez-faire doctrine be described?". Laissez-faire means "let do" and it means that people should do as they want. This means also that the government should not be interfering into people's life choices. From the options, the best one is the following one: a free market with limited government regulation of business - a sitution where the government has very little control over the market</span>
