6(3x+5)
6*3x=18x
6*5=30
<u>18x+30</u> is your answer! I hope this helped! :)
Yes because its is the same thing with a different view
Answer:
<em>A) Be sure the task is understood.
</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
The principle "Make sure the mission is understood, performed, and achieved."
<em>Another way we talk about this principle in the Navy is through the idea of "intrusive leadership." In some respects both "micromanagement" and "intrusive leadership" sound terrible. </em>
Think about certain great managers and leaders you have had in your career yet again. Probability are they will be the ones who asked you those difficult questions, too.
They moved everyone to new technical levels, and eye for detail. When you said you knew what you were doing or when you announced the progress of a project, they didn't necessarily take it to face value.
Answer:
573.33
Step-by-step explanation:
599+14.33
= 573.33
(if rounding then its 600+14.33) = 614.33
Answer:
92 attendees had activity cards
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the number of students with activity cards. Then 130-x is the number without, and the total revenue is ...
7x +10(130 -x) = 1024
7x +1300 -10x = 1024 . . . . eliminate parentheses
-3x = -276 . . . . . . . . . . . . . collect terms; subtract 1300
x = 92 . . . . . . divide by 3
92 students with activity cards attended the dance.
_____
<em>Comment on the solution</em>
Often, you will see such a problem solved using two equations. For example, they might be ...
Let 'a' represent the number with an activity card; 'w' the number without. Then ...
- a+w = 130 . . . . the total number of students
- 7a +10w = 1024 . . . . the revenue from ticket sales
The problem statement asks for the value of 'a', so you want to eliminate w from these equations. You can do that using substitution. Using the first equation to write an expression for w, you have ...
w = 130-a
and making the substitution into the second equation gives ...
7a +10(130 -a) = 1024
This should look a lot like the equation we used above. There, we skipped the extra variable and went straight to the single equation we needed to solve.
