Georgia meant that the Cherokee Nation did not have legal recourse against Georgia laws that sought to force them off their land. The Cherokee Nation did not give up and attempted to sue again in Worcester v. Georgia (1832). This time, the Court found in favor of the Cherokee people
Hope this helps :D
Supported by the unspoken threat of a powerful military president roosevelt used big stick diplomacy in many foreign policy situations
Answer:
Colonists hated the new laws such as the Acts because they took power away from colonial governments which led to Boston Massacre. ... Why do you think the colonists believed that these laws were "intolerable"? The laws were unreasonable: took power away from colonial governments.
Explanation:
Answer:
To profit and trade.
Explanation:
For a variety of reasons, the British desired an empire. To begin with, the discovery of the New World allowed for the accumulation of wealth. Metals and minerals abound in the Americas, and the English, then British, were keen to take use of them. The large open regions present in the Americas also allowed for expansion. This might be utilized to relieve land strain at home, be farmed for items needed in Britain, and serve as a trading post on the route to the Far East, hopefully. Trade was a major driving force. The East India Company and the Royal African Company were founded as a result of a lack of profit.
Answer:
helped inspire political reforms or revolutions in Europe, especially in France.The Social Contract argued against the idea that monarchs were divinely empowered to legislate.
Explanation:
