The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Whether, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as a person for this purpose. Its effect was to give the southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally, thus allowing the slaveholder interests to largely dominate the government of the United States until 1861. The compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman.
Answer:
she used language that was too technical for a general audience and she overestimated how much the audience knew about computer programming
Explanation:
In speech presentation, it is necessary for the speaker or lecturer to carry his/her audience along. This is achieved by explaining in details and clear terms some professional jargon to the audience and to be basic in the speech, the speaker must not assume that everyone is an expert in that area and as such should explain terms that may be confusing.
The primary purpose of the MCA is to promote and safeguard decision-making within a legal framework. ... by empowering people to make decisions for themselves wherever possible, and by protecting people who lack capacity by providing a flexible framework that places individuals at the heart of the decision-making process.
Answer:
Alternative explanation
Explanation:
The alternative explanation is considered to be in all of the outcomes of the evaluation. These evaluations are formal or informal. There are many investigators, researchers, and managers that should be scrutinized outcomes for evaluations and the explanation so that new further information. The app-rant outcomes may be reflected by the methodological issues for example selection bias.
Thus in the above explanation people who have more than two cars have bigger homes. and have more money. So that people think that people who have a car garage and a bigger house have more money but the researcher here failed to eliminate the alternative explanation.
You may not give yourself enough space to make a safe stop!