there is no following just so you know and this question needs edited thanks
I believe it's C. Zhu Yuanzhang hope it's right :)
<em>C. To say that the rights listed are the only rights citizens have.</em>
Explanation:
The Anti-Federalists wanted to have a weak government, as they felt like having a strong government would result in an abuse of power. They often associated having a strong government with British tyranny.
The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The government could not tax the states, enforce laws properly, regulate trade, draft soldiers, etc. The Anti-Federalists agreed with this, but the Federalists wanted to amend the Articles and thought having a strong government meant having a strong country.
Eventually, the Articles of Confederation was going to get reworked during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, but it ended up getting scrapped and the United States Constitution was created instead. The Anti-Federalists did not agree with this and wanted to have a Bill of Rights to protect the citizens from the power of the government.
The Federalists deemed the Bill of Rights unnecessary but wanted to please the Anti-Federalists, so the Bill of Rights was created. It guaranteed the rights of the citizens and protected the rights of the states from the federal government. It also set up the rules for due process, which is respecting the legal rights of citizens and not abusing power.
The Anti-Federalists did not say anything about that the rights listed are the only ones that the citizens have. The Bill of Rights gives all of the power to the citizens that are not otherwise stated to go to the federal government.
Answer:
Explanation:Although some cases are decided based on written briefs alone, many cases are selected for an "oral argument" before the court. Oral argument in the court of appeals is a structured discussion between the appellate lawyers and the panel of judges focusing on the legal principles in dispute. Each side is given a short time — usually about 15 minutes — to present arguments to the court.
A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case. The Supreme Court, however, does not have to grant review. The Court typically will agree to hear a case only when it involves an unusually important legal principle, or when two or more federal appellate courts have interpreted a law differently. There are also a small number of special circumstances in which the Supreme Court is required by law to hear an appeal.
