Answer:
United States Golf Association rule 14-1b of January 2016; The rule be challenged in a United States Golf Association Court of Arbitration
Explanation:
The source of law is from the Rule 14-1b of United States Golf Association rules adopted in January 1, 2016 which includes regulations that prohibits anchoring the club to the chest when making a stroke. Anchoring means a situation where the player holds his hand in way to firmly grip and swing the club
The rule be challenged in the United States Golf Association Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) which is an international body set up for the resolution of disputes which may arise from sport. The golfers can file their claims at this court to push for a judicial redress with a convincing evidence.
There are several reasons why Ted Bundy deserved the death penalty. He killed a lot of people
<h3>Reasons why the death penalty was an
adequate punishment for Ted Bundy:</h3>
- He killed a lot of people in the society.
- He was a predator.
- He raped people.
- He was a kidnapper
- He had no mercy for the people he attacked.
- He was jailed, he escaped from Jail and still killed again.
- If granted parole in years later, someone like him would still atatck innocents again.
- It was the good that the society got rid of him. People like him would always be a danger to other good people.
- The people that he killed did not deserve to die also. He was only made to tast his own medicine.
Read more on the death penalty here: brainly.com/question/509558
Answer: No, because a dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction is not on the merits.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, it should be noted that the case should not be dismissed by the court due to the fact that the dismissal is based on the lack of personal jurisdiction.
It should be noted that the claim preclusion should be added to the answer of the defendant as it's an affirmative defense and it requires more than the claimant bringing a case against the same defendant.
Answer:
I dont know the law behind this but if the state says anything about having a certain amount of stereos then it would be illegal but if not then he could just get charged for shoplifting and maybe interrogated.
Answer:
Due to the first Amendment, the freedom of speech and peacefully assemble is protected
Explanation:
Try B in your question
