They mummified people who had the money. :)
If the American colonists were allowed more control and representation in they British government they most likely would've been satisfied and wouldn't have started a revolution. If there wasn't a revolution the United States might've still been part of Britain today.
For the answer to the question above asking, w<span>hich of the following best explains why people do not have unlimited first amendment rights?
The answer is that there are</span><span> certain types of speech could infringe on others' rights or public safety.
I hope my answer helped you.
</span>
Answer:
B. It was the first of a series of disruptions which indicated the need for a strong central government.
Explanation:
Daniel Shays is well known in the history of United States of America who took the initiative to fight against the corruption going in the government.
Daniel Shays in the year 1786 started his rebellion from Springfield against corruption and unjust prevailing in the then government. His rebellion against the corrupt government reveals the weakness of the government.
It lays the foundation stone for the creation of a clean, corruption free and strong government in the central.
Thus the answer is B. It was the first of a series of disruptions which indicated the need for a strong central government.