Answer: A
Explanation:
cuz i got it right on edg :)
Answer:
Sometimes it's good to be unhappy is the correct answer.
Explanation:
A rainy day is a poem written in three stanzas of five lines each. The speaker compares the rainy day with his own feelings and past situations and the excerpt belongs to the las stanza.
Letter A is the correct option because of the phrase "some rain must fall", understanding the rain as a metaphor of unhappiness, which is not totally bad as long as it does not turn into something that happens everyday. Also, as we can see in the next line, "the sun is still shining" which could be understood as part of a brighter future and coming back to happiness to keep balance.
C) similarity
Explanation:
The messages of these two poems are similar as both poems suggest that music offers contentment in life.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Just like how John Keats calls a thing of beauty to be a joy forever, music is something which provides a lot of happiness for the poet. Here, in the first poem, he feels happy to sing a song when he is with his cattle. In the second one, he likes to hype up his soul using a song. In this way, concluding that the poet explains the significance of music and how it has influenced him in both the poems.
Hello, This question is incomplete. The full question is:
When we arrived, however, the library was closed. About a dozen people were milling about the glass front doors, wearing puzzled expressions and muttering with frustration
Which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding for the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?
A. The quality is good; the evidence supports the claim by using a personal example to show that there is clear community demand for the library's services
B. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the claim by showing a need, but it would be better if the writer had asked each person why they were frustrated.
C. The quality is poor; the evidence does not give an exact statistic to explain how many of the people were at the library to attend a program.
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Answer:
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Explanation:
In order to present a good support of evidence, the author must present data about the programs offered by the library, their quality, availability and the relevance they present. In order to know about these data, it would be important that the author had heard the public's opinion about the library's programs, since, as users, the public can offer a view with less bias.
