1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
castortr0y [4]
3 years ago
5

Explain ONE example of an imperial state that gained territory through a treaty settlement after World War I.​

History
1 answer:
I am Lyosha [343]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The aftermath of World War I saw drastic political, cultural, economic, and social change across Eurasia, Africa, and even in areas outside those that were directly involved. Four empires collapsed due to the war, old countries were abolished, new ones were formed, boundaries were redrawn, international organizations were established, and many new and old ideologies took a firm hold in people's minds. World War I also had the effect of bringing political transformation to most of the principal parties involved in the conflict, transforming them into electoral democracies by bringing near-universal suffrage for the first time in history, as in Germany (1919 German federal election), Great Britain (1918 United Kingdom general election), and Turkey (1923 Turkish general election).[citation needed]

You might be interested in
In what region in the world do pumpkins originate from
Oxana [17]
Pumpkins originated from the Americas
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the name of the bomber plane created by the United States for World War 2
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

The name was  B-25 Mitchell

6 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
What did you learn from the pictures about the hardships and challenges faced by US soldiers in Italy
LuckyWell [14K]
It says what you learned from the picture above but their is no image attached
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to eugene v. debs’s speech to the jury before sentencing under the espionage act (1918), what did socialists in the un
Yuki888 [10]
Eugene V. Debs discusses how socialists in the US strive for financial and social equality among all US citizens. Debs describes how American society can be extremely unfair, as some individuals are born into wealthy families and never have to work a day in their life while other individuals work extremely hard their entire lives just to survive.

This is why Debs, and socialists in the US in general, strive for a system in which the government has more control of the means of production and the economy in general. Debs argues that all things in the US are jointly used and that it only makes sense for the government to be involved in making sure these resources are spread out equally to citizens.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In your own words what is religiouss moderation
    13·1 answer
  • On which issue did president Truman make progress?
    13·1 answer
  • What food was the main thanksgiving dinner back in 1621?
    8·1 answer
  • What contributed to the end of world war 2?​
    10·1 answer
  • 2.
    6·1 answer
  • How did James Watt influence the industrial Revolution
    9·2 answers
  • How did Alexander the Great gain control of all of Greece
    15·1 answer
  • Which countries gained their independence in the years immediately following World War II? Select all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • The Compromise of 1850 centered around what issue? A. Taxes B. Tariffs C. Immigration D. Slavery
    9·1 answer
  • How did FDR show his leadership during the Great Depression? can someone please help me?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!