1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aniked [119]
2 years ago
11

How are the speakers’ sense of goals different in "Because I Could Not Stop for Death" and "Some Keep the Sabbath Going to Churc

h"?
The speaker in the former knows exactly what her goal is, while the speaker in the latter believes that she has already achieved it.
The speaker in the former thinks that she may never reach her goal, while the speaker in the latter is far more confident.
The speaker in the former is not interested in achieving a goal, while the speaker in the latter is passionately interested.
The speaker in the former views her goal as intangible, while the speaker in the latter considers her goal as too distant to achieve.
English
1 answer:
lukranit [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a) The speaker in the former knows exactly what her goal is, while the speaker in the latter believes that she has already achieved it.

Explanation:

We can see that the speaker is overjoyed to be able to spend his Sunday at home instead of going to church.

You might be interested in
This is very easy!! but you need to give me proof​
insens350 [35]

Answer:

jubilant

Explanation:

it means 'feeling or expressing great happiness and triumph'

6 0
2 years ago
What year did elie wiesel win the nobel peace prize??
sveta [45]
On December 10th 1986 in Oslo City Hall, Norway! 
8 0
3 years ago
Which elements would you least likely use to develop an idea in a personal narrative?
deff fn [24]

Personal story is a literary narrative that describes personal experience; it is typically told in the first person, and its subject matter is unconventional. An account from one's life or experiences is considered "personal." The term "nontraditional" describes literature that does not adhere to the standard definitions of a narrative.

Which elements would you least likely use to develop an idea in a personal narrative?

When we are told stories that help us understand people's viewpoints on the world, we are better able to comprehend how they feel and think. Due to their digestible style and the fact that we are empathizing beings, personal narratives aid in our ability to relate to the tales of others.

It needs to have an introduction, a narrative, a setting, a climax, an anticlimax (if there is one), and a conclusion.

The tone should be established in the introduction, and the main point(s) you wish to make should be highlighted throughout the body. What lessons you have taken away from the just-told narrative can be stated in the conclusion.

Your narrative essay should showcase your distinct worldview. Establish your point of view, the main ideas you want the reader to remember, and your voice. Before you begin writing the story, it is a good idea to have a clear goal in mind.

To know more about Personal Narrative, click on the link below:

brainly.com/question/28066770

#SPJ9

4 0
9 months ago
Which statement best explains the difference between a comedy and tragedy?
mihalych1998 [28]
It’s the first “A”






Explain
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A summary of the new Jim Crow book version
enot [183]

Alexander details the history of “racialized social control” (20). From slavery to Jim Crow to mass incarceration, she identifies a persistent pattern by which systems of racial subjugation are built, maintained, dismantled, and finally transformed to fit the circumstances of a given era. In the case of mass incarceration, politicians like Ronald Reagan built the system to fit into a new post-Civil Rights Movement paradigm that prohibited politicians from making overtly racist appeals to American voters. In this new era of supposed colorblindness, Reagan—and later George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton—utilized “law and order” (50) rhetoric that implicitly demonized Black men as predators. In the middle of Reagan’s presidency, crack cocaine swept through urban communities of color, giving “tough on crime” advocates the perfect pretext to launch an aggressive drug enforcement campaign against Black American males.

 Alexander explains exactly how the new racial caste system works, beginning with its point of entry: the police. Empowered by Supreme Court decisions that effectively gutted the Fourth Amendment, police officers may stop and search individuals under the faintest pretexts of probable cause. Yet just because police departments can target millions of Americans suspected of possessing small amounts of drugs, the question remains of why they choose to divert time and resources away from addressing more serious crimes like murders and rapes. Alexander points to huge financial incentives offered by the federal government to encourage widespread enforcement of minor drug infractions. Massive federal cash grants and changes to civil asset forfeiture laws have made participation in the drug war extraordinarily lucrative for state and local police departments.

In the following chapter Alexander explores why, in many states, Black Americans make up as much as 80% to 90% of individuals who serve time in prison on drug charges, even though the system is formally colorblind and whites use and sell drugs at similar rates. Unlike in the case of robberies or assaults, where clear victims exist, those involved with drug transactions are unlikely to report them to the police because doing so would implicate themselves in a crime. As a result, police must be proactive in addressing drug crime and are therefore afforded an enormous amount of discretion concerning whom to target. As for why police departments choose to disproportionately target people of color, Alexander blames both implicit biases and pervasive media and political campaigns that frame Black men as criminals in the American imagination. Prosecutors are also granted an outsized amount of discretion thanks to the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for drug criminals. With such harsh sentences hanging over the heads of those charged with drug crimes, prosecutors are better empowered to extract plea deals. While these plea deals may keep an individual out of jail, they also frequently result in a felony record, saddling that person for life with what Alexander calls “the prison label” (189). The consequences of this prison label are the focus of Chapter 4. When an individual leaves prison or accepts a felony plea deal, they face legal discrimination in employment, housing, welfare benefits, and often voting rights. It is here that Alexander observes the strongest similarities between mass incarceration and the Jim Crow era, given that Black Americans faced these same forms of discrimination during the first half of the 20th century in the South. She also addresses the stigma felt by everyone touched by the criminal justice system, which includes the formerly incarcerated, their families, and any individual who can expect daily harassment from police officers. The following chapter outlines the specific similarities and differences between Jim Crow and mass incarceration. Aside from the legal discrimination in both systems, Jim Crow and mass incarceration have similar political roots. Both systems gained political support from elites who sought to exploit the economic and cultural fears of poor and working-class whites. Both operate by defining what it means to be Black in America in the cultural imagination—in the case of mass incarceration, that means defining Black men as criminals. Perhaps the most significant and frightening difference is that while both slavery and Jim Crow were systems of labor exploitation, mass incarceration involves marginalization and removal from society. Alexander points out that similar racially based marginalization efforts were precursors to genocides in the 20th century.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What best explains how the introduction of the Declaration of Independence supports Jefferson’s purpose
    6·1 answer
  • What figurative language is this?
    5·1 answer
  • Discuss semantic profile of the word commit
    7·1 answer
  • Your self esteem
    13·1 answer
  • What compromise does Holden make in chapter 12 of The Catcher In the Rye?
    9·1 answer
  • 7. I Who is Othello?
    5·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from "The Pit and the Pendulum."
    6·1 answer
  • Should people resist oppression?<br><br> Give 3 reasons why
    15·1 answer
  • Why should people care about the problem of child labor? Write an argument that encourages people to take action. Explain why th
    6·1 answer
  • Bye everyone have a good night sleep​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!