Incomplete question. Here are the options:
- He thinks kings get too much money and do harm to the country.
- He thinks kings have a right to rule the country, but do not do a good job.
- He thinks kings should be allowed to make important decisions.
- He thinks kings should be worshipped only by members of their church
Answer:
<u>"He thinks kings get too much money and do harm to the country"</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From the quote, we could infer that Thomas Paine was disappointed with the fact that a King was given so much financial privilege which could result in the harm of a country.
We note this from his entire statement, which reads,
<em>“In England, a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain!</em><em> Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.”</em>
Answer:
D
Explanation: Its kind of process of elimination, the Declaration of Rights was wanted by the Anti-Federalists or they would not have ratified for the Constitution, so A would've been exactly what they did not want, because the separation of powers was keeping one person from being in charge of everything. For B no one wanted that because that would have not been good for a new country economically. And for C the reason they were making a constitution would be so there would be no King.
Thomas Edison and Eadweard Muybridge
Explanation:
He studied law at Howard University. As counsel to the NAACP, he utilized the judiciary to champion equality for African Americans
