<span>Napoleon's agreement with the Catholic Church did all of the following.. Make those who had purchased church land his supporters. Recognized Catholicism as the majority religion of France. Restore same stability to France</span>
Since the 1770s, the term "Hessian" has been used to refer to all German troops serving in British service in North America, regardless of where they came from. This is due to the fact that the majority of soldiers were supplied by the territories of Hessen-Kassel and Hessen-Hanau.
<h3>In the American Revolution, why did the Hessians support the British?</h3>
According to Baer, the Hessians were what we refer to as "auxiliary forces. "They were not individual soldiers who joined Britain for financial gain. They were troops that were raised by their respective German rulers, who then made a contract with Britain to rent out complete military units with their own commanders.
<h3>In the course of the Revolutionary War, what role did the Hessian soldiers play?</h3>
Although German troops are best known for their service in the northern theater, they played significant roles in numerous battles. Leopold Philip de Heister's Hessians crushed the American lines at White Plains until they fell. At Post Washington, Hessians under Wilhelm von Knyphausen overran the American protectors.
Learn more about Hessian here:
brainly.com/question/18520942
#SPJ1
China decided who should control Kashmir
Answer:
Beliefs and proof
Explanation:
In my opinion, one of the most hardest challenges that these scientists and Archaeologists face is proof. Is it really the truth? what do i believe? Some <em><u>believe</u></em> that humans originated in Africa over 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago. Note the fact '<em><u>believe</u></em>', have scientists proved this theory of evidence? NO. Do they have human witness of how they looked liked? NO.
All around us there are only theories and beliefs but never proof or evidence.
These are some very crucial factors these scientists face, to be able to actually make people think what they think, to try and convince that even though i may not have proof, our studies and reading are 'vastly' true.
Archaeologists main passion is to understand the past, to collect data and readings, to try and interpret hidden meanings... But have we gotten a conclusion? The origin of man is a very complicated subject. As a Christian i have different beliefs, like others will to.
This brings more frustration for scientists and archaeologists to make space for their beliefs too.
I hope this helps and i hope it cleared a bit of confusion, this is just my opinion.
