The answer to the question about poverty effects on children is explained below.
Explanation:
When people live in extreme poor conditions, and are unable to fulfill even the basic needs of living, this is called as poverty.
People, especially children who live in poverty face many negative affects in their childhood as well as further in their lives.
Children who live in poverty are unable to get the nutritional values to its fullest. They are unable to eat and drink to a required level which is necessary in the development of child's brain as well as other physical and mental health development.
In order to decrease the negative effects of poverty on children, government should provide at least the basic food item, containing nutrients that help developing the child's physical and mental health. Further, children living in poverty must be given opportunities to study free in the government schools to compete in their lives.
Learn more about poverty at:
brainly.com/question/14142334
#LearnWithBrainly
The fight-or-flight response, also known as the acute stress response, refers to a physiological reaction that occurs in the presence of something that is terrifying, either mentally or physically. The response is triggered by the release of hormones that prepare your body to either stay and deal with a threat or to run away to safety.
The term 'fight-or-flight' represents the choices that our ancient ancestors had when faced with a danger in their environment. They could either fight or flee. In either case, the physiological and psychological response to stress prepares the body to react to the danger.
Answer:
Issue one: The government should not have the right to issue a higher tax on carbonated drinks/soda to discourage teen obesity because it would be not alter the demand for these types of products. Say for example we use the supply, demand, quantity and price model, supply and quantity are unaffected in this model, whilst price goes up. When the price goes up, this would be an example of where demand does not decrease since the price would not deter people from purchasing it. With the amount of sodas that have to be regulated and how common they are to the everyday life, it'd be a waste of time. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the government to regulate personal choices done by the customers, it is their own choice if they choose to be healthy or not.
Issue two: The government does not have the right to monitor our actions on the internet to keep the nation safe from terrorism. The internet is a free market, a public entity supplied by public cooperations and access given by ISPs. The government's jurisdiction does not give them permission to monitor the internet as it could possibly fall under a violation of the fourth amendment. The ISPs, social media networks, and any other cooperation has the right to monitor actions as it'd be written out and agreed by the user in their terms of service, the government should not have involvement, only their intervention is required when a report is filed.
Issue three: The government should be allowed to outlaw texting while driving since it is a hazard to personal safety and the safety of others. The roads in the United States of America are mostly public, and texting while driving impairs the user's ability to react to incoming situations, whilst taking their focus off the road. Similar to drinking while driving, it only becomes an issue when the safety of others aside from your self is put at risk. In which case, I do believe the government has the right to outlaw texting while driving to keep drivers safer on the road.
Explanation:
The correct answer is number 4.- current concern; personal project.
According to distinctions between types of idiographic goals, a current concern is something you think about, whereas a personal project is something you do.
This means that your current concerns are issues, events, situations that interest you or you feel some kind of worried about. It could be personal issues, difficulties at school or the workplace, maybe relationships or family issues. On the other hand, your personal projects are the solid ideas that you are turning into strategies to accomplish your goals on a personal or professional level.
Yes,it is basically illegal.....
