The answer is: When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.
This happen because the student's argument is extremely influenced by whether they could be involved in the comprehensive exam.
If the exam would be implemented in the following year, the students are very likely to face the exam themselves. This make them much more likely to have negative attitudes toward the idea.
If the exam would be implemented in the next 10 years, the students wouldn't have to face it. Therefore, their attitude would be less negative toward the comprehensive exam.
<span>Bana Holon isteyen bir mesaj var demek?</span>
Cases that involve the bill of rights
Establishing colonies<span> would also allow </span>Spain<span> to increase its trade. This would also benefit the </span>Spanish<span> economy. Another reason for establishing </span>colonies<span> in the Americas was to spread their religion. The </span>Spanish<span> were Catholic and they wanted to do missionary work and spread the Catholic religion.</span>
