<u>Full question:</u>
People scoring high on the ________ dimension of the Big Five model are more likely to be socially dominant, "take charge" people than those who score low.
A) agreeableness
B) conscientiousness
C) openness
D) extraversion
E) emotional stability
<u>Answer:</u>
People scoring high on the extraversion dimension of the Big Five model are more likely to be socially dominant, "take charge" people than those who score low.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Extraverts lead to be more satisfied in their careers and their lives as a mass. They encounter added positive passions and they more easily formulate these attitudes. They also perform to achieve better in responsibilities that need vital interpersonal cooperation.
Ultimately, extraversion is a comparatively powerful predictor of administration evolution in organizations; extraverts are more humanly authoritative, "take charge" kinds of characters, and they are commonly more aggressive than introverts. One downside of extraversion is that extraverts are more unpredictable than introverts
Answer:
More, had a comparative advantage, produce more
Explanation:
In the previous example, the United States and Brazil were efficient when they specialized. Brazil choose to specialize in the production of bananas because it in producing it. The United States and Brazil when they specialize.
Explanation:
The judiciary consists of Supreme Court and the associated lower courts. Every country has its own Judicial Structure. The most common Judicial structure consists of a Supreme Court, which is the most highest court of the country. Then there comes the High Court which is under supreme court, then comes the Civil court and the associated other lower courts. The supreme court has the power to make amendments in the laws if anything is happening against the constitution. Supreme court can determine what federal laws mean, and can revert or overturn them if they are unconstitutional. Supreme Court is the Supreme Authority and has the supreme powers in a Judiciary and country.
Answer:
d. fraud.
Explanation:
Berry was fooled by Clyde when he attests false information about his supposed experience. Because of the fact that this information is not true, Berry can sue Clyde for fraud, arguing that he presented false information and put his life at risk, once Clyde had no experience and, apparently, he didn't know the canyon.
