<em>The Constitution states people’s rights and civil liberties but sometimes this rights are violated. Per example regarding discrimination matters; the right to vote; to have a house; to have education. In these cases a person can go to the court and they can sue the one who is violating their rights. Then the court can interfere in the situation against the government, business or the person that is violating your rights. The court can check if the law is being applied accordingly with the Constitution and can set measures to make your rights being applied using many legal tools as financial penalty, prohibitions or law adjustments.</em>
Answer: 1: Britain, 2: Navigable railroads, 3: It freed up the labor needed to work in factories, 4: Lived in the cities, 5: Cotton, 6: Water loom, and 7: Steam Engine
This question refers to the War in Vietnam. By 1965, the United States was reluctant about the idea of fully committing to the war in Vietnam. However, the involvement of the United States in the war continued to grow, as that same year, the number of American combatants grew from 50,000 to 100,000. This process of increased involvement was known as the "Americanization" of the war.
Those who disliked the idea of increased involvement generally did so because they believed that the payoff would be too small compared to the risk and cost of getting involved. However, Commanding General Westmoreland and Secretary of Defense McNamara disagreed.
They believed that the most important mission of the United States was to halt the spread of communism. Therefore, they thought that, under no circumstances should the Viet Cong be allowed to win. To this purpose, McNamara published his "Program of Expanded Military and Political Moves with Respect to Vietnam." This suggested that a victory of the Viet Cong would be impossible as long as the United States became fully involved in the war.
Yes. Someone, somewhere can help you. Maybe its me. Maybe its not. Kinda need to see it to know though... ;)
Answer:
Although James Madison initially presented political opinions that supported the idea of a national government, as well as thinking in other countries, he ended up changing, and his preference became for stronger state governments because the direct government of citizens was impractical and he believed it was less likely to produce good public policy.
Explanation:
