Answer and explanation:
The Columbian exchange or Columbian interchange is a term named after Christopher Columbus. It refers to the colonization and subsequent trade that began with Columbus's trip in 1492. The Columbian exchange involved the Americas, Europe, and West Africa during the 15th and 16th centuries, and resulted in an extensive transfer that greatly impacted all involved. The term contemplates not only the trade of goods, but also of animals, people, cultures, and even diseases. Some of the major things exchanged were domesticated animals - horse, donkey, chicken, cattle, turkey, parrots, guinea pig, etc. -, and fruits and plants - acai, avocado, broccoli, celery, carrot, chia, pecan, oregano, etc. It's worth remembering that products were exported to and from both the New and the Old Word. A side effect of such contact between different continents and people was the transfer of diseases. Indigenous people in the Americas were decimated by the illnesses transmitted by colonizers. The exchange of cultures had a great impact on both Europe and North America. Enslaved Africans brought their knowledge concerning agrarian practices such as water control and milling. Europe began shifting towards Capitalism and was the subject of population growth due to the availability of new products and crops. Colonizers introduced European values to indigenous nations, ranging from land possession and division to monogamy. There was a noticeable disrupt in ecosystems, since the trade of animals brought in invasive species - a species that is not native and, for that reason, tends to spread and damage the environment.
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Explanation:
Many types of research show that about someone's personality, politics, status, age, and income just looking at the photo of your shows. When you dressing, grooming considers what it says about you or whether it is not the line of massage you want to communicate. There is no right or wrong, its all about context. A tie can make you look like a gentleman and rooted in tradition. This might be important at an investment firm where the client wants to know that, you are serious about that of stewarding their capital But it can also come off as stuffy and resistant to change which may appropriate for a tech startup. Dressing smart is also important for your self-image and your confidence and sense of self-empowerment. But your style just not more than a send a message to your mind and others.
West coast is the answer hope it helps
According to bussinessdictionary.com, a media structure is the interconnected characteristics of a market, such as the number and relative strength of buyers and sellers and degree of collusion among them, level and forms of competition, extent of product differentiation, and ease of entry into and exit from the market
<span>
</span>
