C knowing how to dissect a test and the questions
Answer:
Weather, Time, and Altitude
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer should appear in a paragraph format
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Based on the information given the length of one side of the hot tub is 4. 8 ft.
<h3 /><h3>Length:</h3>
Using this formula
Length=B prime C prime length/Scale factor
Where:
B prime C prime length=24 feet
Scale Factor=5
Let plug in the formula
Length=24ft/5
Length=4.8ft
Inconclusion the length of one side of the hot tub is 4. 8 ft.
Learn more about length here:brainly.com/question/17135976
