Answer:
1.) A REASON SUPPORTED WITH EVIDENCE
2.)FOUND EVIDENCE
3.)PRESENT
4.)However, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Answer:
Credibility and an American approach to sports analysis.
Explanation:
The biggest difference in sports analysis between Europe and America is, in many's view, the Americans' obsession with statistics. One cannot watch a sports game without the commentators using at least a dozen statistics to prove the greatness/importance of a team, player or game.
Gerald Early is no different. The task of writing about Jackie Robinson is not easy for anyone, with Robinson being such an important figure in American sports. Early was probably not the first and surely will not be the last to do that.
In order to add credibility to his writing, distinguish his work from those of other people and last, but not least, to appeal to the American reader, Early tries to use as many sources as possible to support his arguments. He does that masterfully because, instead of the sources diminishing Early's voice in the writing, they do the opposite. Gerald Early uses the sources to enhance his own voice by always making the sources' relevance dependent on his own claims.
<span>Norris, one of the superintendents, made the Yellowstone roads, roads, built one of the park headquarters at Mammoth Hot Springs, hired the first “gamekeeper,” and campaigned against hunters and people who tried to destroy the park.. Much of the primitive road system he laid out remains as the Grand Loop Road. Through constant exploration, Norris also added immensely to geographical knowledge of the park.
</span><span> Nathaniel P. Langford, another superintendent was a member of the Washburn Expedition and advocate of the Yellowstone National Park Act, was made a volunteer who greatly helped the park.</span><span> He entered the park at least twice during five years in office—was in the 1872 Hayden Expedition and to evict a squatter in 1874. Langford did everything he could without laws to protect wildlife and other natural features, and without money to build basic structures and hire law enforcement rangers.
Hope this helps!</span>
A systematic process<span> is often closely associated with critical thinking. In general the application of a </span>systematic process<span> is regarded as a means of management aimed at reducing the number and severity of mistakes, errors and failures due to either human or technological functions involved.</span>
The question above is intended to analyze your writing and reading skills. For this reason, it is not right for me to write an essay for you, but I will show you how to write it.
First, you should read "A Sound of Thunder" and "Nethergrave," understanding the two texts and deciding which one is best, in your opinion, and what reasons make you come to that opinion.
After this reading, you can write your essay as follows:
- Introduction: Present the background information for the story you will present in the essay and then show your thesis statement. The thesis statement is your take on this story, where you will show that it is better than the other.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. In these paragraphs, you will show the reasons that make you believe that the story you chose is better than the other story. You will have to show information from both texts to verify your arguments.
- Conclusion: End the essay by showing your final thoughts about the story, summarize your arguments, and reinforce your thesis statement.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24334991?referrer=searchResults
