1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
3 years ago
9

Arthur J. Jone, who quit his job as a public defender

History
1 answer:
mixer [17]3 years ago
5 0

An effective <u>public defender system</u> should be funded in the same way other organs of government are funded - via taxes.

<h3>What is a public defender system?</h3>

In the United States, the public defender system is a system of attorneys-at-law appointed by the courts to defend, represent and advise those who are unable to afford to hire a private lawyer or attorney.

The public defenders are usually appointed or provided by the state or federal government. Their job function stems from the fact that every developed society must maintain a justice system that is founded on equity and justice to remain functional.

This is a justification for why taxes should be appropriated to fund the system. They may also be funded from fines paid by individuals or corporations who err against the state.

See the link below for more about public defenders:

brainly.com/question/14649908

You might be interested in
Special words or expressions that are used by a particular profession and are difficult for others to understand are called:
FrozenT [24]
Special words or expressions that are used by a particular profession and are difficult for others to understand are called "jargon," since they are often only understood by people "in the know". 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give one argument in favor of the Tea Act and one argument against the Tea Act.
Marta_Voda [28]
I can't give any benefits to the tea act.But the tea act granted a monopoly on tea sales to American colonies.So they had to pay more for tea.
5 0
3 years ago
In the period 1450 - 1750, imperial expansion relied on the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed trade to establish la
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

We can compare the Mongol Empire with the British Empire in three ways:

The Mongol Empire did not colonize as much land as the British Empire.

Several reasons account for this, first, it's a demographic problem: the Mongols were less than the British, so they did not have enough people to populate conquered areas.

Secondly, the lands the Mongold conquered were already inhabited by other ethnic groups and there was not a lot of room.

The British Empire founded colonies in areas that had sparse population: Australia, Canada, the United States, and thousands of colonists emigrated and found room to establish farms.

The Mongol empire was interconnected by land, the British Empire was interconnected by water:

The entirety of the Mongol Empire was located in Eurasia, and spanned across deserts, praires, plains, mountain ranges, and river banks. The British Empire included territories all over the globe, in the five continents, and was held together thanks to the might of the British Navy, by far the most powerful navy at the time.

The British gained more wealth from the Empire than the Mongols:

The height of the British Empire coincided with industrialization. In a positive feedback loop, the British extracted raw materials from their colonies, and transformed them into finished goods and services. This brought enormous wealth to Great Britain.

The Mongol Empire on the other hand, did extract wealth from their colonies, but as they were not industrial yet, they did not so to the same extent.

7 0
4 years ago
In the first half of the 19th century, why did the U.S. Congress work to keep a balance between the number of slaveholding state
NeX [460]
Because they didn't want war between slave holding and nonsalve holdimg states.
3 0
3 years ago
What is one water conservation policy in California? City water districts charge more to residents who use less water. Residents
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

Only water-efficient appliances are sold in stores.

Explanation:

One water conservation policy in California is;

Only water-efficient appliances are sold in stores

From the choices given, this appears to be the most correct alternative.

I hope this helps.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pictures of the 1920s do the 1930s Great Depression
    15·1 answer
  • During the history of the presidency, most arguments over candidacy qualifications have revolved around the __________ qualifica
    12·2 answers
  • Who says the following and why? They bring in their own calves and lambs to feast the friends of the bride-to-be, yes, and showe
    11·2 answers
  • Where was the original location of the Mayas?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the decision of the Marshall court strengthen the federal government
    11·2 answers
  • Help I NEED HELP ASAP
    8·2 answers
  • How did the civil service help to maintain the stability of the Roman Empire?
    15·2 answers
  • What happened to King Charles I during the English Civil War?
    10·2 answers
  • Does this work?<br><br> afalfjklfkfhkljfhakjfh I need to get 20 characters lol
    8·2 answers
  • Why is the electoral college so important ?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!