<u>The correct answer is A. What proof the tipster is able to provide.</u>
The reason why it's anonymous is probably because <em>the person providing the information doesn't feel comfortable providing their identity</em>. That's why we have so many tip lines that assure us we won't be asked for our names, information about where we live or even how we know what we know. All they care about is the information we provide and the accuracy of it.
Hence the correct answer can't be C or D. Just imagine what would happen to the tipster if they are quoted or exposed. They want the crime to stop but they don't want to be harmed for being the people talking about it.
In order to stop the crime or expose it, it is<u><em> necessary</em></u> for the reporter to have <em>concrete evidence</em> of it. Without proof, the reporter won't be able to check if the tip is true. His reputation is also undermined if what he publishes turns out to be fake, so proof is very important.
Answer B it's also incorrect because the <em>intention </em>of the tipster should be <em>irrelevant</em>. Also by stating why they want to talk, they'd be revealing who they are to the criminals (or at least give them an idea) and they wouldn't remain anonymous anymore.
Answer:
check explanation...hope this helps!
Explanation:
Between the 1940s and 2000s, commercial television had a profound and wide-ranging impact on American society and culture. It influenced the way that people think about such important social issues as race, gender, and class. ... Finally, television helped to spread American culture around the world
1. Valid. The statement shows that if rock comes from Venus, it doesn't contain silicon. Rocks came either Mars or Venus. SO when rock contains silicon, it came from Mars not Venus.
(If Venus, then NOT silicon)
(Venus OR Mars)
(Silicon)
(Mars; Valid)
2. Invalid. It is not true that people with happiness must have a lot of money. The first premise is a false premise. Secondly, it is not true that people earn a lot of money with hard working. The second premise is also a false premise. Therefore this is an invalid statement.
Hope this help you
<em>Some men in the village use Christianity as a guide, while others rely on local medicine.</em> This is the correct option. The discussion begins making reference to these two views. A man explains what the Holy Books says about fathers and sons - the problem is that Nnaemeka wants to marry a woman his father does not approve of-. Then, another man , " more practical" , suggests Nnaemeka's father see a native doctor , " a good herbalist".
These options are not right:
-Some of the men think Nnaemeka is sick, but no one thinks he is cursed. This is not the culture divide but the men's opinions about the boy's state.
-Nnaemeka's father wants to bring in an herbalist, but the other men in the village try to talk him out of it. The father does not want to see a herbalist. He does not rely on them.
-Nnaemeka’s father does not want to accept his son’s choice, but the other men urge him to reconsider. The father does not agree with his son but the other men think the son is ill. The other men think Nnaemeka's choice may be the symptom of a desease.
