Answer:
I believe it is option C.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. Tinker v. Des Moines and Texas v. Johnson were cases involving the exercise of symbolic speech. Tinker v Des Moines was about students rights to free speech when being published by a public school. <span>Texas v Johnson overturned a law against desecrating the US flag. </span>
The right-brain vs left-brain theory has lead many people to believe that one side of their brain is dominant over the other. This would mean that they would either be “left-brained” or “right-brained”. Thus attributing to left being rational and right being artistic.
This is like: logical is to artistic
The correct answer would be option C, It is void.
An unscrupulous investor completes a contract with a buyer to sell a property the investor does not own. This sales contract for the transaction is Void.
Explanation:
When something is not legally bounded, or there is no legal restrictions to carry that thing, then this would be considered void. An invalid, null or cancelled thing is called as void.
So according to the question, when a dishonest, and unfair person or investor makes a deal with the buyer to sell a property which he does not own, and goes into a contract with him, then the contract is void, because the person himself does not own the property he is going to sell. There will be no legal binding of this contract.
Learn more about Void Contract at:
brainly.com/question/9582675
#LearnWithBrainly
