Freud would say that is, "it has been sublimated into a socially desirable behavior." This is sort of a defense mechanism, in which socially inadmissible driving forces or admirations are unwittingly changed into socially adequate activities or conduct, perhaps bringing about a long haul transformation of the underlying motivation.
The correct answer is: "integrity vs despair"
The question is refered to Erickson's steps of psychosocial development. This theory appoints that each stage in life poses a challenge. Two opposing forces act over the person, who has to be able to resolve the trade-off, by adopting the positive force (integrity, in this case) and discarding the negative one (despair), in order to sucessfully advance in the development of his/her psychosocial personality. The sucessful fulfilment of one step enables to reach the next step.
This period in a person's life, after 65 years old, means the beginning of the last stage of psychosocial development in which the person, for the first time, experiences a sense of mortality. Reaching integrity means accepting oneshelf and living in peace the way towards death, which is felt with proximity at this point in life.
<u><em>There are 2 types of economies,</em></u>
<u><em>---> Formal economies ( Eg: Capitalism, Socialism etc)</em></u>
<u><em>----> Informal economies ( Eg : Underground Economy)</em></u>
<span>Both share responsibility and control over the property </span>