At the trial court level, the plaintiff (Beth Smiles) prevails. What is the basis of the defendant’s (Coastal) appeal?

1 answer:

5 0

In general-jurisdiction courts, such as most state courts, a jurisdictional allegation is unnecessary. The most critical part of the complaint is the claim, or cause of action. The claim is a concise and direct statement of the basis upon which the plaintiff seeks relief.

You might be interested in

Explain how the tabacco companies could challenge the rules. Discuss whether the rules will be set aside. It is helpful to defin

xeze [42]

7. ¿Cómo se puede describir su vida actual / ahora? |ı
8. ¿Cómo se describe el espanglés? ¿Qué piensa de este dialecto?
9. ¿Cómo ha cambiado su español? ¿Cómo reacciona a estos cambios?

7 0

2 years ago

Is Governor Newsom’s proposal a proper function of state government? Why or why not and what are the likely impacts on the busin

olga55 [171]

Answer:

YES.

Explanation:

Because it just is.

5 0

2 years ago

Stop bullying! Stop The HATE! ITS NOT NICE! The Girl you just called fat? She has been starving herself & has lost over 30lb

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

Ur right

Explanation:

We should never bully anyone

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A feature of decisional law in common law systems which says that, a court, in making a decision, should follow the rulings of p

zalisa [80]

Answer:

Stare decisis

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a Latin terminology meaning standing by that which is has been decided.

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that mandates the courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis makes sure that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. Courts must follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

4 0

3 years ago

H e l p pleaseeee is due in 30 min

FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

In this case, the Supreme Court has to rule against Niskayuna High School. The reason for this is because the high school did not respect Goode's beliefs and practices when it came to religion. According to the summary, Goode had lost a Harvard scholarship just because of practicing religion. The high school does not have the right to take anything away from the student; therefore, the Supreme Court has to force the Highschool to pay for Goode's Harvard tuition. Also the court has to take into consideration the fact that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendent, because every person in this world has to have the right to practice any religion as desired.

7 0

2 years ago