Answer:
In this case, the Supreme Court has to rule against Niskayuna High School. The reason for this is because the high school did not respect Goode's beliefs and practices when it came to religion. According to the summary, Goode had lost a Harvard scholarship just because of practicing religion. The high school does not have the right to take anything away from the student; therefore, the Supreme Court has to force the Highschool to pay for Goode's Harvard tuition. Also the court has to take into consideration the fact that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendent, because every person in this world has to have the right to practice any religion as desired.
Snell's law is defined as the ratio of the sine of angle of incidence to the sine of the angle of refraction which is constant for a given pair of media and it is also known also as refractive index of the medium.
Answer:
Tell them that you're in love I think they'll get it l.m.a.o
Answer:
i’m white and i agree with you, there is no reason for people to be treated differently because of race
Explanation:
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.
About Equal Protection Clause
The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances. Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.
To know more about Baker v. Carr:
brainly.com/question/29398317
#SPJ4
