At the trial court level, the plaintiff (Beth Smiles) prevails. What is the basis of the defendant’s (Coastal) appeal?

1 answer:

5 0

In general-jurisdiction courts, such as most state courts, a jurisdictional allegation is unnecessary. The most critical part of the complaint is the claim, or cause of action. The claim is a concise and direct statement of the basis upon which the plaintiff seeks relief.

You might be interested in

Which of the following amendments would protect you in the scenario found in the following question?

ANEK [815]

That would go against the 10th amendment say states make their own laws

3 0

2 years ago

What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?

devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

There are two types of tortious interference

Tortious interference with contract
Tortious interference with good economic advantage.

Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0

2 years ago

Allows an appointed attorney-in-fact to make decisions about the grantor's medical care

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

(Might not be right) B. medical directive

Explanation:

An advance healthcare directive, also known as living will, personal directive, advance directive, medical directive or advance decision, is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness

5 0

3 years ago

What do individual rights have to be balanced against ? Why?<br>20 points

Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

Individual rights are balanced against the individual rights of others, and the rights of everyone as a whole, or the common good, or basically, what benefits everyone. ... The government and courts can also use their power to keep individuals from harming the public as a whole when utilizing their individual rights.

8 0

3 years ago

Based on the data in the two tables, which statements are accurate? Check all that apply.

VikaD [51]

Answer:

A. Voters who were college graduates were more likely to support Clinton than Trump.

E. High income voters making over 100k were divided in their support for Clinton and Trump.

Explanation:

edge

3 0

3 years ago