Answer:
Robbery
Explanation:
Robbery and larceny may seem similar but there's a difference between the two. The basic distinction between robbery and larceny crimes is that robbery involves the <em>use of force</em>, whereas larceny doesn’t. So, in the scenario provided, force was used in order to deprive someone of their property. Thus, the answer is B.) Robbery.
Answer: Assuming international recognition and relative peace, the most important function of government are ensure public order and provide means for conflict solving. The other functions can be covered by people or the private sector (how effectively is a question that remains unanswered) but only the State should have an army or a police force and only the state can provide for a legal system and a political system in the national level.
Explanation:
Answer:
maybe
Explanation:
ome observers believe the crisis is due to the lack of economic opportunities, while others argue that it’s a result of foreign meddling and disproportionate military power. The reality, though, is that these are all consequences rather than the cause of Pakistan’s troubles. Taken as a whole, they underscore a deeper crisis within Pakistani society that goes right to the nation’s very foundations—a crisis of identity that originates in the late 19th century, when the idea of an independent Muslim nation in South Asia first emerged.
As Pakistan was founded in truly modern terms—inspired by the principles of self-determination that were prospering during the wave of independence movements in the post-World War II era—the best place to start understanding Pakistan isn’t actually one of these former colonies, but a future colonist: post-revolutionary France.
Not only does Pakistan’s post-independence trajectory bare an uncanny similarity to that of France’s First Republic, but the critiques of its path are similar to those of the French Revolution.
Answer:
The Benefits of No First Use
First, it would enhance crisis stability. A credible NFU policy would help decrease an opponent's trepidations about a U.S. first strike, thereby reducing the possibility that nuclear weapons are used accidentally, inadvertently, or deliberately in a severe crisis.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: the type of interference which was most likely the basis for this suit is interference with a contacting relationship, and it is occurring here.
Explanation:
Hughes had a contract with Medtronic where they specifically mention he can't work for a competitor for one year after leaving the company because of protection of the company, after Hughes accepted and broke that clause he is making an interference with a contacting relationship with Medtronic.
