1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexandr1967 [171]
2 years ago
9

Describe how British got affected by the Khilafat Movement?​

History
1 answer:
kakasveta [241]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Khilafat movement was an agitation by Indian Muslims, allied with Indian nationalists, to pressure the British government to preserve the authority of the Ottoman Sultan as Caliph of Islam after World War I. While seemingly pan-Islamic, the movement was primarily a means of achieving pan-Indian Muslim political mobilization.The Khilafat issue crystallized anti-British sentiments among Indian Muslims that had increased since the British declaration of war against the Ottomans in 1914. The Khilafat leaders, most of whom had been imprisoned during the war because of their pro-Turkish sympathies, were already active in the Indian nationalist movement. Upon their release in 1919, they espoused the Khilafat cause as a means to achieve pan-Indian Muslim political solidarity in the anti-British cause. The Khilafat movement also benefited from Hindu-Muslim cooperation in the nationalist cause that had grown during the war, beginning with the Lucknow Pact of 1916 between the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, and culminating in the protest against the Rowlatt anti-Sedition bills in 1919. The National Congress, led by Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948), called for non-violent non-cooperation against the British. Gandhi espoused the Khilafat cause, as he saw in it the opportunity to rally Muslim support for nationalism. The ‘Ali brothers and their allies, in turn, provided the non-cooperation movement with some of its most enthusiastic followers.The combined Khilafat Non-Cooperation movement was the first all-India agitation against British rule. It saw an unprecedented degree of Hindu-Muslim cooperation and it established Gandhi and his technique of non-violent protest (satyagraha) at the center of the Indian nationalist movement. Mass mobilization using religious symbols was remarkably successful, and the British Indian government was shaken. In late 1921, the government moved to suppress the movement. The leaders were arrested, tried, and imprisoned. Gandhi suspended the Non-Cooperation movement in early 1922. Turkish nationalists dealt the final blow to the Khilafat movement by abolishing the Ottoman sultanate in 1922, and the caliphate in 1924.

You might be interested in
Was Fletcher nervous about entering Indian Territory?
shutvik [7]
Yes because of the mountainous area which can be a great danger for ambush.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do the Populist Party Platform and the Republian Party Platform differ?
lana [24]

Answer:

The main political goal of the Populist Party was to give farmers a voice and end their oppression, injustice, and poverty. This differed from the goal of Republicans who believed in small government and supported large corporations. Industrialists and bankers also supported the gold standard, not free silver.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is the government’s role in the economy?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

to give the people there right and to protect them.

Explanation:

In class the tell you that government of to things to do One to give people rights and two to protect the people.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Silk originated in China and was produced from worms that were fed _______ _________.
olya-2409 [2.1K]
They were fed mulberry leaves
4 0
4 years ago
make an argument in defense of promoting the desires and interests of individuals above the public good. Use reason and evidence
almond37 [142]
Individual desires are more important than that of the public's opinion on what is "good" because what is good for the majority many not be good for certain individuals in society. For instance, A majority of the population in America is white. During the advent of civil rights, many whites opposed the allowance of blacks in America to have the same rights as white people. If the matter was decided on popular vote alone, blacks may have been oppressed longer. But the minority protections the country has as a republic were cause for the movement for civil rights not to have to convince the whole country, just enough politicians to move legislature.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the concept of "hubris" from Greek tragedy apply to the Peloponnesian War?
    6·1 answer
  • what were the differences between the working class, upper class during the socialist reformers during the progressive era
    14·1 answer
  • The Tigris and Euphrates Rivers are part of what region?
    9·1 answer
  • As a result of the Russo-Japanese War, Japan
    10·1 answer
  • Please help will give brainliest
    5·1 answer
  • Who was responsible for overthrowing queen liliverani
    5·1 answer
  • Union tactics during the Civil War: Enforcement of an embargo on
    11·2 answers
  • The president is officially elected by
    14·2 answers
  • Write a report analyzing a President or issue of your choice related to American involvement in World War I
    10·2 answers
  • This type of resolution has the force of a law because the President signs off on it. This type of resolution was used to declar
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!