1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena L [17]
2 years ago
6

What did the Sadducees and the Pharisees have in common?

History
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: The answer is B.

Explanation: There are many times in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John about the Sadducees and the Pharisees opposing Jesus.

You might be interested in
In one paragraph, compare life in the Roman Republic with life in the Roman Empire. Include specific examples that explain how l
dlinn [17]

How did Rome go from being one of many city-states in the Italian peninsula to being the center of the most powerful empire in the ancient world? Part of the answer lies in the political institutions that Rome developed early in its history. As Rome expanded its influence over more and more areas, its political institutions proved both resilient and adaptable, allowing it to incorporate diverse populations.

According to Roman tradition, the Republic began in 509 BCE when a group of noblemen overthrew the last king of Rome. The Romans replaced the king with two consuls—rulers who had many of the same powers as the king but were elected to serve one-year terms. Each consul could veto, or reject, the actions of the other consul. Although the office of consul probably did not exist in its final form until around 300 BCE, the idea behind this change—to prevent any one man from becoming too powerful—was present early on in Roman thought and shaped many of Rome’s political institutions.

Roman political institutions reflected Roman society, which was divided into two classes: the patricians, wealthy elites, and the plebeians, the common people. Initially, only the patricians were able to hold political office and make important decisions. For example, plebeians could not join the Roman Senate—an advisory body unable to create laws on its own but whose recommendations were taken seriously by the consuls. To become a senator, a Roman had to have held a political office, and plebeians could not. Over time, however, the plebeians were able to gain more influence in the political system.

Between the years 494 and 287 BCE, new political offices for plebeians were created and access to higher office, including the consulship, was opened to them. Voting assemblies and councils were established that gave plebeians more say in the politics of Rome. In 287 BCE, a law removed the last barrier to plebeian political participation by abolishing the requirement that proposed laws had to be approved by patrician senators before the Plebeian Council could consider them.

The Plebeian Council had real power and influence in Roman politics and some plebeians gained power and wealth under these new arrangements, but many remained poor. One reason that political rights did not lead to major changes was that the Comitia Centuriata—the main voting assembly that elected consuls and other important officials—was organized based on wealth. Each century—or voting group—had one vote, but the wealthy were split into smaller groups than the poor, giving the vote of a wealthy Roman more influence.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Surveys and interviews differ in which important way?
trapecia [35]
Interviews are in person, therefore there may be interviewer and interviewee bias in regard to the questions being asked.  Only so many interviews can take place during any given period of time.  Surveys eliminate interviewer and interviewee biases.  And surveys can reach a large majority of people.  However, surveys are only good if they are actually returned. 

Hope this helps!  :)
3 0
3 years ago
Look at the t-chart graphic organizer.
Vsevolod [243]

Answer: to organize ideas for comparing and contrasting two topics

Explanation:

hope this helps                                                                                                                                                              

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help!!! full completed chart will mark as Brainliest. ​
liberstina [14]
Jhdjib lxxitkgitjtzjritzkyzitsmhkykyhitoyd
7 0
2 years ago
Many had hoped that a compromise would be reached to prevent further nation divide. Which compromise do you think could have bes
dimulka [17.4K]

One of the main reasons for the civil war was the differences with slaves about whether it was illegal or legal to have slaves. This could have been avoided if there was agreement on how slaves should be treated.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the main symbols commonly used on maps
    9·1 answer
  • Which resources are nonrenewable resources ?
    12·2 answers
  • _____ was the first to distinguish between common causes and special causes in process variation
    5·1 answer
  • Women emerged from the american revolution with the prescribed new responsibility of?
    6·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a primary reason France sought to colonize North America? 
    15·1 answer
  • Which behavioral trait will you demonstrate while interacting with a customer? disclosing customers’ personal information to oth
    14·1 answer
  • How did the country of France contribute to the instability of the Germany economy after World War I?
    5·1 answer
  • A theory created by John Locke that says in order for people to protect their natural rights, they must create a contract betwee
    5·1 answer
  • How the ANC's moderate approach changed to a militant approach from the 1952 to 1960 in resting Apartheid laws
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!