All categories

2 years ago

What's the difference between a venture capitalist and an angel investor? Check all that apply

Business

1 answer:

Wittaler [7]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

-A venture capitalist is more likely to invest in several different projects at once.

-An angel investor is motivated by personal feeling more than profit

You might be interested in

Having term limits on Boards of Directors for companies forces firms to rotate leadership to get new ideas. It also creates this

yKpoI14uk [10]

The available options are the following:

-Board members serve on multiple boards

-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information

-Less frequent board meetings

-Better decisions about important issues

Answer:

-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information

Explanation:

Considering the available options, the option that appears negative and related to the point being discussed is

"People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information."

It is straightforward, as changing the board of directors will at some point lead to a time where the new member in the board of directors will just be a competent worker but has no history with the company.

8 0

3 years ago

Bond P is a premium bond with a coupon rate of 9 percent. Bond D has a coupon rate of 5 percent and is currently selling at a di

Firdavs [7]

Answer:

a) 7% as their market price will adjsut to give the same yield as the market

b) bond P = -10.17

bonds D = 10.07

Explanation:

we have to calcualte the price variation of the bonds from now (10 years to maturity) to next year (9 years)

Bond P

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 90.000

time 10

rate 0.07

$90 \times \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-10} }{0.07} = PV\\$

PV $632.1223

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity 1,000.00

time 10.00

rate 0.07

$\frac{1000}{(1 + 0.07)^{10} } = PV$

PV 508.35

PV c $632.1223

PV m $508.3493

Total $1,140.4716

then, at time = 9

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 90.000

time 9

rate 0.07

$90 \times \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-9} }{0.07} = PV\\$

PV $586.3709

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity 1,000.00

time 9.00

rate 0.07

$\frac{1000}{(1 + 0.07)^{9} } = PV$

PV 543.93

PV c $586.3709

PV m $543.9337

Total $1,130.3046

Capital loss: 1,130.30 - 1,140.47 = -10.17

We repeat the process for bond D

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 50.000

time 10

rate 0.07

$50 \times \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-10} }{0.07} = PV\\$

PV $351.1791

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity 1,000.00

time 10.00

rate 0.07

$\frac{1000}{(1 + 0.07)^{10} } = PV$

PV 508.35

PV c $351.1791

PV m $508.3493

Total $859.5284

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} = PV\\$

C 50.000

time 9

rate 0.07

$50 \times \frac{1-(1+0.07)^{-9} }{0.07} = PV\\$

PV $325.7616

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity 1,000.00

time 9.00

rate 0.07

$\frac{1000}{(1 + 0.07)^{9} } = PV$

PV 543.93

PV c $325.7616

PV m $543.9337

Total $869.6954

Capital gain: 869.70 - 859.53 = 10.07

6 0

3 years ago

The city of New Orleans has 200 advertising companies, 199 of which employ designers of normal ability at a salary of $100,000 a

zepelin [54]

Answer:

a. $700,000

b. 6/7 or 85.7%

c. No they will not.

Explanation:

a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.

Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs

= 1,000,000 - 400,000

= $600,000

Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income

= 100,000 + 600,000

= $700,000

b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.

Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.

Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent = $\frac{Economic rent}{Jacobs annual earning}$

= $\frac{600,000}{700,000}$

= 6/7 or 85.7%

c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.

8 0

3 years ago

Which of these factors would strengthen demand for a nation’s currency on the international market? Select all that apply.

-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

B C D F

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is it called when any amount of money is debited (subtracted) from the checking account?

blsea [12.9K]