1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faust18 [17]
3 years ago
6

By law, manufacturers and distributors are responsible for providing safety data sheets. Who else is responsible for providing s

afety data sheets?.
Law
1 answer:
Marina CMI [18]3 years ago
6 0

The Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200(g)), revised in 2012, requires that the chemical manufacturer, distributor, or importer provide Safety Data Sheets

sure hope this helps you

You might be interested in
pol 470 Justiciability is an appropriate or suitable reason for a federal tribunal to hear or to solve a conflict. Question 7 op
Sophie [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that a federal tribunal can hear or solve a particular conflict by referring to the concept of justiciability. Justiciability is a term in law that refers to the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority. In other words, justiciability establishes the situations when a particular court can exercise its duties. When a court cannot provide an adequate solution to a dispute, the matter is considered not justiciable.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the agencies that interpret law​
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

All agencies have to interpret their enabling legislation to determine what they can legally do. If the legislation is clear and detailed, the agency's role will be easy to determine and there will be little controversy over the interpretation of the law

3 0
3 years ago
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to avoid an illegal activity. to secure her privacy rights. to challenge the
krok68 [10]

Answer:

to have a law declared unconstitutional

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should the president be able to ratify or veto the law? Is that too much power?​
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

The president should be able to do that because if he didn't our world today would be so messed up. We wouldn't have any laws. Also that is not too much power.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Democratic vs Republican view on gun control
olasank [31]
Democrats are pro gun control however republicans are anti gun control and they want no laws put into place.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is meant by protected characteristics?
    14·1 answer
  • 1. An open intersection is one without traffic control signs or signals; when you enter one, you must yield the right-of-way if
    7·2 answers
  • Justices practice judicial restraint when they
    15·2 answers
  • The equal protection clause is found in the​
    8·1 answer
  • In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plot
    5·1 answer
  • Why should US citizens volunteer to improve conditions in their community?
    9·2 answers
  • If a man sues his neighbor for a violation of the rights of personal property, what type of law is he employing? O A. Criminal l
    8·1 answer
  • Is it assited s*icide or is it considered murder?
    8·1 answer
  • What qualifies as the first broken window theory in law
    10·1 answer
  • A jazz singer was contracted to perform for two nights at a nightclub .four days before he was to appear , the club burned to th
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!