The agency that maintains a database that might help Stacy with her case is A. An international agency that maintains databases of international crime.
<h3>What is fraud?</h3>
It should be noted that fraud simply means a wrongful deception intended to achieve financial or personal gain.
In this case, the agency that maintains a database that might help Stacy with her case is an international agency that maintains databases of international crime
Learn more about fraud on:
brainly.com/question/25481401
#SPJ1
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
The US constitution resolved one weakness of the articles of confederation that was the lack of the power of the central government in the tax regulation and regulation of commerce.
What is the article of confederation?
Article of confederation was the First constitution of US which was made by the congress in order to have the national government in November 1777. This article was enacted in 1781.
Article of confederation involved with the one weakness that the central government was lacking in the power for the regulation of tax and commerce.
In order to resolve that issue they gave the second draft in which they gave freedom to all other states thus it protected their rights and gave them autonomy.
Learn more about constitution here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
Answer:
affirmative action began as a government remedy to the effects of long-standing discrimination against such groups and has consisted of policies, programs, and procedures that give time limited preferences to minorities and women in job hiring, admission to the institutions of higher education, the awarding of government
Explanation:
