1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
2 years ago
15

Thank you for helping me tq...

Law
1 answer:
Lemur [1.5K]2 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

mention not

Thank u for points

You might be interested in
A state recently passed “fetal heart beat” legislation that prohibits abortions in cases where the fetus has an audible heartbea
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

I think it's Roe v Wade but I may be wrong, hope this helps you in some way :)

4 0
1 year ago
What is the minimum distance you should leave between your vehicle and a stopped school bus that is unloading children?
laiz [17]

Answer:

100 feet

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you know Catmemeslol then report her please, she is sending hurtful comments. Please all I need you to do is get this message
GrogVix [38]

YEAH!!!!! SAY IT BROTHA/SISTA

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The primary mission of police is to fight crime and immediately respond to
Maksim231197 [3]
I think the answer is true
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the different terms for the judges in each system?
    5·1 answer
  • What case set 18 as the minimum age for the application of the death penalty
    5·1 answer
  • Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde
    13·1 answer
  • A conference committee is
    10·1 answer
  • Vehicle skids are most likely to be caused by
    8·2 answers
  • Who should decide if a book or movie is obscene? What definition should be used?
    8·1 answer
  • Ryan is a forensic scientist who works with human remains that are not easily identifiable. Which type of forensic scientist is
    8·2 answers
  • Cases involving foreign governments or state v. state have original jurisdiction in the U.S. Supreme Court.
    15·1 answer
  • Reserved powers are NOT found within the ______________________.
    12·1 answer
  • Israeli authorities have a firm policy of refusing to negotiate or give in to terrorist demands T/F
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!