Answer:
Defendant
Explanation:
In the case of your question, the answer is the defendant. However, the place where the trial is held is usually the place where the crime was committed. But usually, that's also the place where the defendant lives. It just depends. But yeah your answer is defendent.
No since it can cause people to harm others because of their nationality and their ethnicity. That’s the reason why the law didn’t regulate hate speeches, it only makes people hate each other and they know it isn’t right.
Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
I think that it was completely childish. i mean don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious, but trump really really annoyed me. neither of them could get a proper answer out and it annoyed the hell out of me. the fact that trump didn’t denounce white supremacy just didn’t sit right with me
Answer:
Explanation:
Also called “legal presumptions;” those which derive their force and effect from the law, rather than their natural tendency to produce belief
