The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
B.) Regard it as a stop sign: come to a complete stop and proceed when traffic is clear.
Explanation:
A flashing red light is pretty much a yield sign but you have to come to a full stop, it has the same principle as a yield but it treated slightly differently.
may I get brainliest please :)
<u>Explanation:</u>
It could be rightly called an example of an Informal process of criminal justice since<em> Zachary </em>faced intense scrutiny from local authorities even though he wasn't involved in his brother's shooting.
Informal justice refers to personal decisions about what is considered just. <em>In Zachary's case despite having not proven guilty of similar crimes by his brother, he was perceived by many as a threat. </em>
