Answer:
Threatening
Explanation:
It would consider it a crime because person B pulled out a knife and threaten to stab person A if he/she didn't get out of the seat
The answer is C.) Ask questions to help you determine their competence.
Yeeeeee me plsss I beg you
Answer:
I would most definitely go and help the family of that house and call 911 as I head over so I would have a sort of back up just in case something went wrong.
Explanation:
I just have to stall the robber for time if I were to get hurt so the police can arrive although I could handle myself.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.