1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following could be said about ecological footprints?

Biology
1 answer:
Zielflug [23.3K]3 years ago
5 0
<span>A. Exact ecological footprints are often difficult to calculate, but estimates can be useful in comparing populations.

</span>Which of the following could be said about ecological footprints? <u /> <u>Exact ecological footprints are often difficult to calculate, but estimates can be useful in comparing populations.</u><u />


NOT:
b. Ecological footprints can't be used to determine carrying capacity.
C. Ecological footprints don't take into account resources needed to absorb and manage wastes.
<span>D. The average ecological footprints for various countries are nearly identical.</span>
You might be interested in
Compared to the outside surface, the inside of a resting cell membrane is
olga2289 [7]
Independent of the conditions of the outside of the cell
3 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between osmosis and diffusion
Sedbober [7]
One big difference between osmosis and diffusion is that both solvent and solute particles are free to move indiffusion, but when we talk aboutosmosis, only the solvent molecules (water molecules) cross the membrane. ... When people discussosmosis in biology, it always refers to the movement of waters
8 0
4 years ago
How is solar power used for heating?
Kipish [7]

Answer:

B. the sun heats water stored...

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first two steps in the lithification process are:
Natalka [10]

Answer:

The answer is D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
True or false: Theoretically, it is possible (but very difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while.
Debora [2.8K]

It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.

There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.

There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:

  • no mutation
  • random mating
  • no gene flow
  • infinite population size
  • and no selection (natural nor forced).

You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.

For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.

Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.

If you want to learn more, you can read:

brainly.com/question/19431143

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When fish are under water are they dry or they wet.
    13·2 answers
  • Why is the magnet able to separate the sand from the iron?
    13·1 answer
  • Some members of this protozoan group cause red tide
    6·1 answer
  • CRQ QUESTION: A species of birds lives on an island. The thickness of the birds’ beaks varies within the population. The birds f
    11·2 answers
  • Write a claim, evidence, and a reason. About What is the relationship between photosynthesis and cellar respiration
    11·1 answer
  • NASA has published a list of criteria for identifying fossil bacteria in samples from Mars, as part of a search for evidence of
    12·1 answer
  • What are the 4 most abundant/ important elements for humans?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes how human lifestyles are currently affecting the sustainability of resources on Earth?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the biggest difference when comparing a prokaryotic and a eukaryotic cell?
    9·2 answers
  • MEIOSIS. Questions
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!