Well first we shall start with
1) After the French and Indian War the British put the Proclamation of 1763 that banned settlement west of the Appalachian mtns in order to prevent further Native-Settler conflict however the colonist viewed that they deserved the land after their participation in the F and I War.
2) The colonist were also angry because of their inferior treatment during the F and I War.
3) The British began to heavily tax the American colonies to help pay off their war debts(Tea Tax, Stamp Tax etc....)
4) Britain closely restricted colonial trade which forbid the colonists from trading with anyone except the British
5) The British also passed the Abominable Acts which were a set of laws that composed of the Quartering Act and others like it that the colonists viewed as invasion of privacy in the highest degree
Hi!
The central idea of the metaphor was that the people in the lifeboat are the rich nations, whereas those that are drowning are the poor nations.
This metaphor is known as lifeboat ethics, and is used to illustrate the distribution of resources.
The metaphor depicts a lifeboat which is boarded by 50 people (the wealthy nations), and 100 people swimming in the surrounding water at risk of drowning. The 'ethical issue' is stirred by the fact that there is room for 10 more people on this lifeboat, and if the surrounding people should be taken aboard -and if so, what would be the conditions of such an act.
Hope this helps!
Right to life and liberty so that would be B
Answer:The Reconstruction Act of 1867 required southern states to ratify the 14th Amendment—which granted “equal protection” of the Constitution to former enslaved people—and enact universal male suffrage before they could rejoin the Union.Jun
Answer:
B. Put less work in, get more work out
Explanation:
Efficiency means that you want to maximize something with putting little in. With this, the only answer that would make sense would be B.
If you were to put more work in and get less work out that would not be efficient at all. It would be the complete opposite.
If you were to put less work in and get less work out that is still inefficient.
If you put more work in and get more work out that could appear as efficient, but you are still putting in a lot of work which is not efficient.
Thus the best answer would be B. Put less work in, get more work out.
Hope this helps!! Ask questions if you need!
