Answer:
A. to inform the reader that caring for a pet is more difficult than people think.
Explanation:
From the article Caring For Pets Teaches Children Responsibility
<em>Learning to care for pets is a great way to make children not only more responsible, but also empathetic to the needs of others, </em>we understand that pets are a good way to teach responsibility to children as they would be in charge of the pet, taking care of it, feeding and cleaning up its excreta as the case may be.
The writer is of the opinion that owning pets is a good way of not only teaching resposibilty to children, but to also <u>make them more empathetic to the needs of others.</u>
The author understands that giving a child a pet to take responsibility can be overwhelming and not as straightforward as it sounds so he <u>advises that children below th ages of six may not be ready to take care of a big dog and also that a trip to the library to read about the animal before getting it is necessary so the child knows what to expect.</u>
Hello :)
You can write a strong conclusion by recapping everything you discussed and if there was a rebuttle point, again prove why the argument was not strong enough.
Hope this helps
Considering this is English, I'll assume these are text based questions, in which case a book title and chapter reference would be needed to accurately answer this question. But, my guess is that the Capitol did not care to clean the arena, or made special effort to keep everything in order. In the first case, that would say that the Capitol may be poorer, and be understaffed and funded, or that they are simply hapless. The latter, would mean that the games are very important, as well as they Capitol having the money, time, and man-power to keep the arena in order. The Arena could be an iconic place and detrimental to the public relations of the Capitol.
Answer:
Yet it is low impact and requires no fancy equipment.
