1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
2 years ago
15

How do the locations of ancient and modern Indian cities differ?

History
2 answers:
Lelu [443]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Ancient cities developed mainly along the Indus River, while modern cities developed near different bodies of water.

melisa1 [442]2 years ago
3 0
Ancient cities developed mainly along the Indus River, while modern cities developed near different bodies of water
You might be interested in
GLORIA BORGER OR MARY HAM<br><br> ANSWER CORRECTLY AND I GIVE THANKS
Leokris [45]

Answer:

mary ham killed gloria borger

6 0
3 years ago
Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?
seraphim [82]

<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>

<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>

<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>

<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Which factor in the calculation of GDP would cause economic growth?
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

B. decrease in imports

Explanation:

The formula to calculate GDP is: GDP = C + G + I + X - M

In that, C stands for consumer spending, G stands for government spending, I stands for investment, X stands for exports and M stands for imports.

As indicated in the formula, consumer spending, government spending, investment and exports are directly proportional with GDP. So that when there is a decrease in these factors it would result in a decrease in GDP as well.

Oppositely, import is inversely proportional with GDP, thus a decrease in import will lead to the increase in GDP, causing the economic growth.

4 0
3 years ago
6. What did African Americans experience LESS of while fighting in Europe? (Page #563) UP to 84 points if you get it right
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

They experienced less racism to their skin color and slaves were more freed frequently.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the most accurate description of Joliet?
SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

B. He was an explorer sponsored by the French settlements on the Mississippi River.

Explanation:

Louis Joliet was the first person, who wasn't a Native, to explore the Mississippi River. He also discovered numerous other things and was a well known explorer in North America.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the civil rights movement accelerate after world war 2?
    6·1 answer
  • Jefferson's policies in office were less radical than the statements he made during the campaign of 1800
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the steps taken by George W. Bush after 9/11 to help protect the United States from future terrorist attacks.
    6·2 answers
  • How does Mr. Kraler feel about Mr. Frank?
    7·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE HISTORY QUESTION, PLEASE HELP
    7·2 answers
  • HELP FAST PLEASE + BRAINLIEST
    9·1 answer
  • What is the rise of ISIS summary
    10·1 answer
  • What was the experience of North Carolina soldiers throughout the war?
    5·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph explaining how life was different in the west was different from life in the east
    8·1 answer
  • Secondary school in uk with the lowest amount of female students​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!