1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
strojnjashka [21]
2 years ago
8

An attorney renowned for his contributions to the causes of labor, racial equality, and civil liberties was:

Law
1 answer:
Sholpan [36]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The attorney who renowned for his contributions was Clarence Darrow

You might be interested in
The phrases below summarize the primary goals of a political party.
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer: Democratic Party

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the two pieces of legislation relevant to use <br> in the workplace
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

the two pieces of legislation relevant to use

in the workplace are listed below:

●The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

●The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

7 0
3 years ago
........................................................................
Oxana [17]
Um what’s your question?....
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr ?.
Tanya [424]

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal Protection Clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances.  Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398317

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Assume that the U.S. Congress has passed a federal statute that is in conflict with a Wisconsin state constitutional provision.
vredina [299]

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.  

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was partly responsible for the trials of alger hiss and the rosenbergs?
    8·1 answer
  • If a crime is committed in Alpha Township within the county of Beta, which agency has primary investigative responsibility?
    10·1 answer
  • Difference between Dan and bakas​
    14·1 answer
  • Question 2
    5·1 answer
  • Explain in 3 sentences how police call sheets are used in law enforcement. Provide 1 example.
    14·2 answers
  • Internal role players who are responsible for rehabilitation of offenders in corrections
    14·1 answer
  • A example of a question that is not leading
    13·2 answers
  • What makes administrative law different from other types of law?
    5·2 answers
  • Please help on any one that you know thank you
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following country is follow presidential dimocracy system a) france b) Senegal c) USA​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!