How do I stop paying for Brainly. We no longer have students in my home

In a collision, the human body will strike the seatbelt, steering wheel, dash or windshield at?

Dmitrij [34]

The correct choice of the speed with which the human body will strike the seatbelt, windshield, steering wheel or dash is the choice:

The same speed as the vehicle.

The reason for the above choice is as follows:

According to Newton's First law of motion, an object will continue in its uniform motion in a straight line or in its rest state, unless a force acts on it.

The initial speed of a human body in a car having a collision, relative to people on the ground, is the speed of the car.

As the car collides and brought to a stop suddenly, the human body in the

car continues with the same speed as the vehicle until he is stopped by the

seatbelt, or steering wheel dash or windshield force.

Therefore, the human body will strike the closest part of the vehicle in front of him or her, at <em>the same speed as the vehicle.</em>

Learn more about Newton's First law of motion here:

brainly.com/question/21552603

8 0

3 years ago

Prompt

marin [14]

When the declaration of independence was made they basically tried to have philosopher of freedom in it like John Locke. He helped shape the ideas of freedom like he said divine rights ( the power of being a king or queen is given by god) he said that was incorrect that the people gave them the right to be king or queen. He thought that the people can over throw the king if they don't go through parliament and if the government becomes destructive. The government should get overthrown if ithe doesn't help with the people's needs.

MARK BRAINLIEST PLEASE

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me......please and thank you♡

Pie

by Susan B. Anthony (excerpt) Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny. The preamble of the Federal Constitution says: "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people—women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government—the ballot.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson. . . . requiring the officer of the passenger train to as

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The Brown case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.

Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education was a US Supreme Court decision that declared the separation between black and white students in public schools unconstitutional. While this was definitely the case in Brown, the NAACP (National Association for the Progress of the Black Population), founded on February 12, 1909, had been campaigning against racial segregation in the United States for nearly twenty years.

The Brown v. Board of Education may be related to the paragraph shown in the above question, which reports on passenger separation to the bus or compartment designated for the race to which it belongs, because both cases report on the separation of individuals into groups.

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. How has the legal system changed, according to Philip K. Howard?

maw [93]

Answer:

How can freedom be rebuilt, according to Howard? What the world needs now is to restore the authority to make common choices. It's the only way to get our freedom back, and it's the only way to release the energy and passion needed so that we can meet the challenges ofour time.

3 0

3 years ago