Answer: 1.) I went over to my aunt's house which I was very excited for since she was always so kind to me, with her gentle voice and sweet smile, eveything about her was amazing.
Once i walked through the dorr my face lights up.
I cant wait to spend time with her.
2.) I was walking to my aunts house.
Kicking the rocks at my feet taking a sigh, whishing i wasn't born, this women is Dreadful no one ever goes visit her just because of her attitude, she's so revolting I can't stand her just thinking about it makes me want to rip my hair out, once i open the door i can feel the bad vibes rushing towards me, causing chills to run up my spin, what a bad day this will be.
Explanation:it shows the way it effects the persons point of view, the way th aunt makes the person in the story feel.
Answer:
Bad because you got virtually hugged by a teacher(unless you like being hugged by your teacher) but good because she is pretty much saying your meeting the requirements to pass the class since yall are online
Explanation:
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
Answer:
'God forbid I take it from him." John Proctor has made the right decision because he now sees that he is a good man again. He could not see it before and so he was unhappy, but now that he has regained his sense of his own goodness and integrity, he goes to his death with confidence and certainty of his worth.
Explanation:
