Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
Answer:
PTSD
Explanation:
I believe this is the answer but I'm not sure.
Answer:
The diagram is showing structure of muscle.
Muscles are responsible for contraction and expansion during the body movement. Each muscle is consist of several other fibers such as fasicle, muscle fiber, myofilament and microfibril.
As shown in the diagram, muscles carry fasicles, which are which is type of connective tissues. Fasicles then comprise of bundle of muscle fibers. Muscle fibers carry proteins called myofilamentand myyofilament carry microfibrils.
Many public interest groups rely on the courts instead of the legislative or executive branches because they frequently lack the resources to engage in electioneering and lobbying against other interest groups.
They typically challenge federal court judgments and seek state remedies. They frequently have to defend legislative victories against opponents who initiate lawsuits to overturn new legislation.
They typically lack the means to campaign and advocate against other interest organizations.
typically speak on behalf of a sizable group of persons with clout in court. routinely spend large quantities of money to promote candidates for state courts. They often lack the financial resources to advocate against other interest groups and participate in electioneering. usually speak on behalf of a large number of powerful people in the court.
often make significant financial contributions in support of state judicial candidates.
Learn more about public interest group;
brainly.com/question/23371109?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
