Answer:
Parallelism involves using similar structures for two or more parts of a sentence or sentences to create a comparison or pattern. One example in the "I Have a Dream Speech" is the four sentences that begin "one hundred years later" in the third paragraph to discuss all the ways in which African-Americans are still not free. Within one of these sentences that reads "One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination," King also uses parallelism. The phrases "manacles of segregation" and "chains of discrimination" are in parallel form, as they are three-word phrases with a noun, the word "of," and another noun.
Hope this helps!!!!!
Explanation:
The type of credit card that carries the most risk depends you are an individual or an institution. For an individual it is much riskier with letter B, secured with variable interest rate. For an institution it is much riskier with letter D, unsecured with variable interest rate
Answer:
Voting is the best to involve all of the community → reason
Statistics show that voting promotes community engagement → evidence
Communities should encourage people to register to vote → rebuttal
Voting takes too much time → counterclaim
Once you register to vote, it is actually really easy and quick → claim
Explanation:
I have been able to match each statement with the part of a viewpoint it represents.
We see that the reason here is that voting is actually the best way to see involve all of the community.
A rebuttal is seen to be one which nullifies the other evidence. From the evidence stated, it is seen that the statistics show that voting actually promotes community engagement. But the rebuttal tends to nullify that evidence. This is true because the rebuttal reveals that people still find it hard to vote so they need to be encouraged to vote. This then contradicts the promotion of community engagement.
D, because when you realize when something is meant to be yours when you smile when you see it. Love at first sight
A is a statement, doesn’t give much interest towards the dog
B isn’t enough information to convey the idea of her knowing the dog was the one, what if the other dogs were in the same situation?
C isn’t enough either because it said that it was clearly a ‘plain dog’.
“Grandma Nancy is older than the hills” is the hyperbole
