Bruh what THERES nothing to help no pic or anything luv
Hello friend! I believe the answer would be $280
Answer:
The original function was transformed by a a horizontal shift to the right in 1 unit, and also a vertical shift upwards of 5 units.
Step-by-step explanation:
Recall the four very important rules regarding translations (shifts) of the graph of functions:
1) In order to shift the graph of a function vertically c units upwards, we must transform f (x) by adding c to it.
2) In order to shift the graph of a function vertically c units downwards, we must transform f (x) by subtracting c from it.
3) In order to shift the graph of a function horizontally c units to the right, we must transform the variable x by subtracting c from x.
4) In order to shift the graph of a function horizontally c units to the left, we must transform the variable x by adding c to x.
We notice that in our case, The original function
has been transformed by "subtracting 1 unit from x", and by adding 5 units to the full function. Therefore we are in the presence of a horizontal shift to the right in 1 unit (as explained in rule 3), and also a vertical shift upwards of 5 units (as explained in rule 1).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Lets verify with Pythagorean:</u>
- 17² = 289
- 13² + 14² = 169 + 196 = 365
- 289 < 365
The angle opposite to a greater side is less than 90° and the sum of the squares are close.
It means all three angles<u> are less than 90°</u>.
With this the triangle is <u>acute</u>.
Correct choice is A.
Answer:
(x+2)(x+1)
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming im interpreting this correctly, it should be (x+2)(x+1), since if you plug in -2 and -1, it will give you 0, which is the answer.