Answer:
Dred Scott case
Explanation:
The Dred Scott case happened in 1846, when a slave Dred Scott sued for his freedom. His master had brought him along on a trip to a territory where slavery was prohibited, and Scott said that by that right, he had become a free man. However, the Supreme Court upheld the practice of slavery, saying that slaves had no right to bring their cases to court, as they were considered sub-human. This decision stunned the nation, yet the Supreme Court stood by their choice.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
✨individual rights protected by law from unjust governmental or other interference ... government cannot interfere with speech unless the speech presents a clear✨
Explanation:N/A
Answer:
I'm guessing B.
Explanation:
Many people believe taking artifacts and validating tombs of Pharaohs for example is unethical. Basically disturbing the dead and it's history. So taking artifacts can be seen disrespectful in a way.
By organizing their governments and creating long-lasting political institutions. Is this Ap world history on edgenuituy? (Also I’m not sure if my answer is right)
