Answer:
I think Roland is correct in his statement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Roland says the number of cups of iced tea t depends on the number of tea bags b and he says the equation represents the relationship between the number of tea bags b and the cups of iced tea 
.
I think Roland is correct in his statement and this is because here t is a function of b i.e. t = f(b) and hence, the number of cups of iced tea t depends on the number of tea bags b. (Answer)
Answer:
no mode , 6 , 6.24
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
look down there
Step-by-step explanation:
First ball:
Probability of drawing a white ball is 5/8
Probability of drawing a black ball is 3/8
Second ball:
This depends on the first ball drawn, lets say you drew a white ball initially, 4 white balls are left out of 7 balls in total. The probability of a white ball in the second pick is 4/7.
Total probability of drawing two white balls is 5/8*4/7 (since they are independent events).
If you picked a black ball initially, picking another black ball would have a probability of 2/7, on similar grounds , total prob for 2 blacks would be 3/8*2/7.
The probability that you pick 2 balls of same color is (5/14 + 3/28) = 13/28. (Since they are mutually exclusive events)
This argument is no valid although the first part of the statement is valid. If a number is larger than 6 than its square must be larger than 36. But if the number is smaller than 6, its square does not need to be smaller than 36. For example...
(-100)²=10000
-100 is smaller than 6 but its square is bigger.
answer: False
Answer:
The answer is 3x because 3 times 4 is 12, and 12+3=15.
