The reason is that they make it more efficient to deliver necessary goods and services to consumers.
Answer:
D) Wally wins; this agreement is too indefinite since it does not identify which 40 acres are to be sold.
Explanation:
Since in the given situation, wally agrees to sell but here the identification of the land is not mentioned i.e. 40 acres and at the later time the wally refused to sold any land so here wally should wins as the agreement is not definite which type of the land should be sold so it becomes the agreement void
Hence, the correct option is d.
Answer:
Proposal A
3.75 years
Proposal B
3.375 years
Explanation:
<u>Proposal A</u>
Payback = 3.75 years
Year Cash Inflow Initial Investment Balance Year Count
0 0 1,050,000
1 $280,000 770,000 1
2 $280,000 490,000 2
3 $280,000 210,000 3
4 $280,000 0 *3.75
* 1050,0000 / 280,000 = 3.75 years
<u>Proposal B</u>
Payback = 3.375 years
Year Cash Inflow Initial Investment Balance Year Count
0 0 1,050,000
1 $350,000 700,000 1
2 $3150,000 385,000 2
3 $280,000 105,000 3
4 $280,000 0 *3.375
* ( 3 + ( 105,000 / 280,000 ) ) = 3.75 years
Answer:
Wants is less important because you don't need it/them to survive, you can live with only your needs, you should only get your wants only if you can afford it and still have enough money for needs.
Explanation:
I don't know if that made sense lol
The answer is A. Imposition of a non binding price ceiling in the market
Price Ceiling is when a government impose a price limit over a specific product
Non-Binding Price ceiling is if that price limit that imposed to the product is still <em><u>higher than market equilibrium ,</u></em> which won't do anything to producer's surplus
